Friday, March 20, 2015

Should Forex Traders Be Concerned About Fake Regulatory Agencies?

We’ve all heard about fake brokers and forex scams from time to time, but is there such thing as a fake regulatory agency? And should you be worried?
If you’ve paid attention in our School of Pipsology lesson on Forex Trading Scams, then you should be able to quickly identify which among these institutions isn’t a real regulatory agency:
  • Commodity Futures and Trading Commission
  • Financial Conduct Authority
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission
  • European Commodities Commission
  • Swiss Federal Department of Finance
  • National Futures Association
  • Prudential Regulation Authority
Ain’t as easy as it looks, huh?
forex scamIf you’ve answered “European Commodities Commission” then give yourself a pat on the back! Just recently, the Financial Services and Monetary Authority (FSMA) exposed the existence of a fraudulent firm named European Commodities Commission (ECC), which is posing in goody two shoes as a regulatory agency. According to its company page, this so-called supervisory authority is based in Belgium and claims to be a watchdog for securities dealers and other financial institutions offering offshore investment services.
In particular, the European Commodities Commission says that they provide verification of investment services and even assists in arbitration if necessary. However, the FSMA indicated in its press statement that the ECC is improperly representing itself as a financial regulatory agency and that it appears to be used as a front in giving the impression of trustworthiness for potentially fraudulent operations.
Come to think of it, regular folks could be easily lured into forking over their hard-earned cash to a fake broker or a forex scammer that claims to be accredited by the ECC. Regulated by the European Commodities Commission? Seems legit!
Luckily for you, the real good guys out there were able to see right through this fabrication and warn the public about it. It seems that fraudsters are getting more and more creative these days, as they’ve levelled up and invented a seemingly credible supervisory agency in order to promote certain investment services. This means that, even with financial watchdogs already on the lookout, traders like you and I should also step up our game in being vigilant for potential scams. As the FX-men always say, “If something sounds way too good to be true, nine and a half times out of ten… It’s a scam!”

Yellen wolf? And betting on Bligh?

I read an interesting article on Bloomberg.com concerning the performance at PIMCO now that Bill “Captain Bligh” Gross has left the ship. According to the author, the new team now at the wheel has outperformed their old leader by concentrating its bets on the middle of the yield curve, under the expectation the Fed will indeed do the dirty deed—hike rates in June. But the old captain, now at the helm at Janus (not yet rearranging the deck chairs), has positioned into longer term maturities expecting the Fed to stand pat for longer than now expected.

Let’s face it, we don’t know what the Federal Open Market Committee will say tomorrow, though I suspect at least 34.245 trillion man-hours will be wasted guessing, 23 million trees will lose their life for research report writers musing, and at least 23 analysts will show up on CNBC and Bloomberg TV after the fact to say, “I told you so.”
Before I get into my guesses, I want to share a couple of paragraphs from some people who have been more right on bonds over the last 10-years, or more, than anyone; even better than Bligh [my emphasis].
The downward pressure on global economic growth rates will remain in place in 2015. Therefore record low inflation and interest rates will continue to be made around the world in the new year, as governments utilize policies to spur growth at the expense of other regions. The U.S. will not escape these forces of deflationary commodity prices, a worsening trade balance and other foreign government actions.
U.S. nominal GDP in this economic expansion since 2008 has experienced the longest period of slow growth of any recovery since WWII. Typical of the disappointing expansion, the fourth quarter to fourth quarter growth rate slowed from 4.6% in 2013 to 3.8% in 2014. A further slowing of nominal economic growth to around 3% will occur over the four quarters of 2015. The CPI will subside from the 0.8% level for the period December 2013 to December 2014, registering only a minimal positive change for 2015. Conditions will be sufficiently lackluster that the Federal Reserve will have little choice in their overused bag of tricks but to stand pat and watch their previous mistakes filter through to worsening economic conditions. Interest rates will of course be volatile during the year as expectations shift, yet the low inflationary environment will bring about new lows in yields in 2015 in the intermediate- and long-term maturities of U.S. Treasury securities.
Van R. Hoisington
Lacy H. Hunt, Ph.D
Hoisington Economic Research
January 2015
Note the date this was penned—January 2015, as it was Hoisington’s fourth quarter of 2014 summary. They have been dead on the money so far this year as yields have fallen sharply around the globe and US growth is decelerating based on the latest series of economic data I have seen over the past few weeks.
One wonders why Bill Gross continues to play the game given his awesome wealth, excellent reputation (given the body of his work over time), and age. Besides ego gratification the only answer is that he really loves this stuff. And if he loves this stuff and remains focused and now has something to prove to boot, betting against him over time may not be a high probability trade.
So, the stage is set: Could it be that Bligh will rise up and crush the Young Turks once again?
So what does this have to do with US dollar? I suspect if the FOMC shows its antediluvian dovish face once again, the US dollar could stage a significant correction lower triggered by a back-up in benchmark yield spreads. I have included the 2-yr spread versus FX rates in a few of the major pairs below. One thing that stands out is how closely the move in the spread has been correlated with the move in FX rates.
2-year Benchmark Spread Australia – United States vs. AUD/USD Weekly:

2-year Benchmark Spread Eurozone – United States vs. EUR/USD Weekly:

2-year Benchmark Spread UK – United States vs. GBP/USD Weekly:

If you don’t remember the Munity on the Bounty story, let me share a salient summary of one aspect from Wikipedia:
After the mutiny aboard Bligh’s ship he “performed an extraordinary feat of seamanship, Bligh navigated the 23-foot (7 m) open launch on a 47-day voyage to Timor in the Dutch East Indies, equipped with a quadrant and pocket watch and without charts or compass. He recorded the distance as 3,618 nautical miles (6,701 km; 4,164 mi). He then returned to Britain and reported the mutiny to the Admiralty on 15 March 1790, 2 years and 11 weeks after his original departure.”
So, let’s not count Mr. Gross out just yet.

How to Maximize Gains When Trend Following

One of the more common forex questions I get from traders is…
“How do I follow the trend longer-term?”
In other words: How do we get as many pips as we can out of a big trend?
It’s a three step process and requires two type of profit targets.
1) A non-negotiable, parked profit target
2) A trailing stop loss based on historical price movement
The key is knowing when and how much to ratchet the stop!

Dollar Retreats Ahead of Fed Meeting

The US dollar was broadly weaker against other currencies, including the euro, today as Forex traders were cautious ahead of the Federal Reserve’s policy meeting that will start tomorrow. EUR/USD retreated from its daily highs, forming a double-top pattern on the 15-minute chart, but remains above the opening level as of now.
NY Empire State Index demonstrated a drop from 7.8 in February to 6.9 in March versus the predicted increase to 8.1. Still, the report said that “business activity continued to expand at a modest pace.” (Event A on the chart.)
Both industrial production and capacity utilization fell short of expectations in February. Industrial production was up just 0.1% compared to the median forecast of 0.3%. Capacity utilization was at 78.9%, below the predicted level of 79.5%. The January’s readings were revised negatively: from 0.2% to -0.3% for production and from 79.4% to 79.1% for utilization. (Event B on the chart.)
US net foreign purchases were at -$27.2 billion in January while experts predicted the exactly same reading but in a positive territory. The previous month’s reading was revised from $35.4 billion up to $39.2 billion. (Event C on the chart.)

Euro Jumps After FOMC Drops ‘Patience’ from Statement

The Federal Open Market Committee dropped the mention of patience in its statement as was expected by majority of market participants, yet EUR/USD jumped after the announcement that should have been supportive for the dollar. There can be several explanations for such performance. One of them is that the event has been priced in. Another one is that the forecast for growth and inflation got a negative revision.
US crude oil inventories grew by 9.6 million last week to a new record, more than two times the forecast increase by 4 million. Stockpiles expanded 4.5 million in the previous week. Total motor gasoline inventories decreased by 4.5 million barrels last week, but are well above the upper limit of the average range. (Event A on the chart.)
FOMC removed the mention of ‘patience’ in its policy statement released today. (Event B on the chart.) The key phrase that replaced the previous one was:
The Committee anticipates that it will be appropriate to raise the target range for the federal funds rate when it has seen further improvement in the labor market and is reasonably confident that inflation will move back to its 2 percent objective over the medium term. This change in the forward guidance does not indicate that the Committee has decided on the timing of the initial increase in the target range.
Yesterday, a report on housing starts and building permits was released. Housing starts were at the seasonally adjusted annual rate of 0.9 million in February, a bit lower than the forecast of 1.05 million and the previous month’s rate of 1.08 million. Building permits were at the seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.09 million compared to the predicted level of 1.07 million and the January’s 1.06 million. (Not shown on the chart.)

i back here after many years

Hello


I just back here to share my experiences after many years.
Hope you guys back here too.